• Free Newsletters
  • Free Seminars and Podcasts from Industry Experts
  • Free Online Content and More

LIMRA: Even workers closest to retirement are unprepared for it

Print
Email
Reprints
 
By Madhura Karnik
December 4, 2012

American pre-retirees are not taking retirement planning seriously, according to a LIMRA study.

Twenty-five percent of the 33 million U.S. pre-retirees surveyed say they felt “very prepared” for retirement, down from 30% of those surveyed in 2010.

The study considered the pre-retiree population as people between the age of 55 and 70 who have not yet retired. Thirty percent of males said they were very prepared, compared to 23% of females. Also, people with financial advisers seem to be in a better position with 39% of the very prepared already having advisors versus 20% who did not. 

Fewer households have more than $100,000 in financial assets for retirement, compared to earlier years, the study shows. Only 38% of the pre-retirees have more than $100,000 of financial assets with the majority being below the $100,000 mark.

“Pre-retirees’ circumstances have not improved over the past several years with fewer pre-retiree households having $100,000 or more in financial assets (45% in 2007 to 38% in 2010),” says Matthew Drinkwater, an associate managing director of retirement research at LIMRA. “Even more troubling, our survey revealed that pre-retirees have unrealistic expectations regarding how much income they will need and their ability to work in retirement.”

Pre-retirees believe they will need less than 67% of their current income during retirement compared to the 70% to 80% level, which is generally recommended. They also think they will need to withdraw around 9% of their assets annually to pay basic and discretionary expenses.

Working in retirement is what most of the pre-retirees are considering. However, previous research by LIMRA shows that less than a third of current retirees have jobs. “It is important for pre-retirees to recognize that they might be forced to retire before they planned or be unable to work in retirement — diminishing their accumulation years and requiring them to stretch their savings for longer periods than planned,” Drinkwater says.

Madhura Karnik writes for On Wall Street, a SourceMedia publication.

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Benefit News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immediately be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.