The election results virtually guarantee that key portions of health care legislation passed in 2010 will go into effect next year, as scheduled. Thus, many participants will face a 3.8% surtax on investment income.
This tax, designed to augment Medicare funding, may affect single taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income over $200,000 and married couples with MAGI over $250,000.
Bob Keebler, who heads a tax advisory and CPA firm in Green Bay, Wisc., suggests some strategies to reduce the impact of this surtax. On his list:
- Tax-exempt bonds. Switching from taxable bonds to tax-exempts can hold down MAGI and the net investment income that is subject to the surtax.
- Deferred annuities. Such investments may defer taxable income to future years when a client’s income will be lower.
- Life insurance. Again, putting investment dollars into a permanent life policy may defer taxable investment income.
- Oil and gas. Investing in working interests in an oil and gas deal can generate a substantial deduction for intangible drilling costs, thus reducing MAGI and net investment income.
- Roth IRA conversions. A 2012 conversion will produce taxable income before the 3.8% surtax takes effect. Going forward, Roth IRAs have no required minimum distributions. Thus, clients will avoid the future RMDs that would swell their MAGI and could generate the surtax.
Other tactics on Keebler’s list include charitable remainder trusts, installment sales, maximizing above-the-line deductions such as contributions to qualified plans, accelerating 2013 income into 2012, and careful monitoring of estate and trust distributions.
Donald Jay Korn writes for Financial Planning, a SourceMedia publication.
Already Registered?
If you have already registered to Benefit News, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immediately be directed to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.

3 Comments
Posted by: George Burns | November 21, 2012 3:45 PM
I used to wonder why the media put out articles like this, giving advice to people who earn enough etc to already have the services of their own financial planners, tax advisors and others who they are already paying for this same advice. I wondered why not give advice to those who cannot afford it? Then I realized that the majority of those who are not in that high earning category, do not read publications such as EBN, WSJ, Fortune, Forbes etc. The media has to cater to their reading audience, not to the general masses.Kay D, outside of sections of California and the Maryland to Conn coastal area, $250,000 MAGI is BIG money, in most of the rural areas etc $250,000 MAGI is REALLY BIG MONEY, REALLY BIG.
Report this Comment
Posted by: Kay B | November 14, 2012 8:09 AM
The idea that a couple earning $250,000 is "wealthy" is absurd. We are two hard-working individuals whose combined income happens to total $250,000. We work 16-hour days and do not have our "own personal financial planners, lawyers, and accountants". Thank you, EBN, for helping us.
Report this Comment
Posted by: JMae | November 13, 2012 3:50 PM
Why is EBN propagating ways to avoid paying taxes? What a complete waste of time and resources! The wealthy people who are impacted by this have their own personal financial planners, lawyers, and accountants to help them find loop holes and ways of avoiding paying their fair share. I am disappointed in EBN!
Report this Comment
Add Your Comments...